`With the questions raised in the foregoing, I think it is proper to ask those who are not convinced that a homosexual relationship is an appropriate expression of devotion whether it is not a matter of individual conscience. The chapter speaks in general terms about eating "unclean" foods and/or foods offered to idols as well as special or "holy" days, and in verse 14 Paul says that he is convinced that "nothing is unclean in itself; but to him who thinks anything to be unclean, to him it is unclean." Clearly, things may be harmful to eat in greater or lesser degrees, but the "abomination" of shellfish is accepted now, knowing that if there are elements that may need to be processed to avoid harm, there is nothing "abominable" about the food itself and the dietary laws, while protecting the population, were more stringent than necessary now for that purpose.
In that there is nothing inherently more risky in committed homosexual relationships than in heterosexual, I believe that the chapter applies and we are in the position of practicing "16Therefore do not let what is for you a good thing be spoken of as evil; 17for the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. 18For he who in this way serves Christ is acceptable to God and approved by men. 19So then we pursue the things which make for peace and the building up of one another."
These are all questions that need to be prayerfully asked and answered.
Some of us believe that the current question reflects a movement of the Spirit to redress 3,000 years of misunderstanding the intent and purpose of the applicable scripture.
No comments:
Post a Comment